Main Article Content
Abstract
ABSTRACT
This research aims to determine the pragmatic ability of the deaf child in the aspect of social interaction with the use of the total communicational supporting aspects (oral, aural and manual). One aspect of pragmatic ability to do two-way communication with interaction. This research in SLB-B Kab. Sidoarjo consisting of 8 research subjects and 5 informant. The research method used is a qualitative descriptive with the instrument of the data collector used i.e. observation, interviews and documentation. The results of the research obtained is the ability of deaf children in initiating, maintaining and ending communication politely in domination with oral (speech), manual (gesture, finger spelling, gesture, and expression) and the use of 1-3 words.
Keywords: pragmatic;interaction social; total communication;
Keywords
Article Details
References
-
Adams, Catherine, 2002. Practitioner Review: The Asesment of Language Pragmatics. (Online), Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 43:8 (2002), pp 973–987 (diunduh 25 Februari 2019).
Adams, John W., Rohring, Pamela S. 2004.
Handbook of Services for the Deaf and the Hard-of-Hearing. London:Elsevier Academic Press.Bunawan, Lani. 1997. Komunikasi Total. Jakarta: Proyek Pendidikan Tenaga Akademik.
Bunawan, Lani dan Yuwati, Cecilia Susila. 2000. Penguasa Bahasa Anak Tunarungu. Jakarta: Yayasan Santi Rama.
Curtiss, Susan. 2016. Pragmatic and Sematic Development In Young Children With Imapired Hearing.(Online), (http://jslhr.pubs.asha.org/by a Western Michigan University User diunduh 18 Februari 2019).Deaf Children Australia. 2012. Method Communication. ( Online). (www.deafchildrenaustralia.org.au diakses 24 Februari 2019).
Fuad, Anisdan Nugroho, Kandung Sapto. 2014.Panduan Praktis Penelitian Kualitatif. Yogyakarta: GrahaIlmu.
Gargiulo, Richard M.2012. Special Education in Contemporary Society-4th ed. SAGE: Publications, Inc.
Goberis, Dianne, et al. 2012. The Missing Link in Language Development of Deaf and Hard of Hearing Children: Pragmatic Language Development. Makalah disajikan dalam Seminars In Speech And Language. Volume 33, Number 4.
Haenudin. 2013. Pendidikan Anak Berkebutuhan Khusus Tunarungu.Jakarta: PT. Luxima Metro Media.
Luetke- Stahlman, Barbara dan John Luckner. 1990. Effectievely EducatingStudents with Hearing Impairments. New York: Longman Publishing Group.
Med-El. 2017. Teach Pragmatic Skills To Children With Hearing Loss. (online),( https://blog.medel.com/teach-pragmatic-skills-to-children-with-hearing-loss/diakses 18 Februari 2019).
Miles, Metthew B, A, et al.2014. Qualitative Data Analysis, A Methods Sourcebook.Third Edition. United States of America : Sage Publications, Inc.
Moleong, Lexy J. 2014. MetodePenelitianKualitatif. Bandung: PT RemajaRosdakarya.
Mulyana, Dedy. (2005). Ilmu Komunikasi Suatu Pengantar.Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Nadar, F.X. (2009). Pragmatik dan Penelitian Pragmatik. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
National Deaf Children’s Society. Tanpa tahun. Pragmatics: Everyday Communication. (Online)(https://www.ndcs.org.uk/information-and-support/language-and-communication/pragmatics-everyday-communication/diakses 18 Februari 2019)
Ngalimun. 2017. Ilmu Komunikasi Sebuah Pengantar Praktis. Yogyakarta: PT. Pustaka Baru Press.
Rahardja, Djadja dan Sujarwanto. 2010. Pengantar Pendidikan Luar Biasa (Orthopedagogik). Surabaya: Unesa Press.
Ruben, Brent D. Dan Stewart, Lea P. 2013. “Komunikasi dan Perilaku Manusia Edisi Kelima”. Terjemahan Ibnu Hamad. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Santrock, John W. 2007. Perkembangan Anak. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Soewadji, Jusuf. 2012. Pengantar Metodologi Penelitian. Jakarta: MitraWacana Media.
Sugiyono. 2015. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D.Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sunardi dan Sunaryo. 2007. Intervensi Dini Anak Berkebutuhan Khusus.Jakarta : Departemen Pendidikan Nasional Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi Direktorat Ketenagaan.
Tarigan,Henry Guntur. 2009. Pengajaran Pragmatik. Bandung: Percetakan ANGKASA.